• Hacker News
  • new|
  • comments|
  • show|
  • ask|
  • jobs|
  • beans6543 11 hours

    Their demo is flakey and sometimes fails to hydrate in Firefox latest

  • kamisori-daijin 10 hours

    Nice!

  • pjmlp 1 hours

    Bit by bit, we are having our beloved browser plugins back, at least for some of us.

  • gosen 2 hours

    It would be interesting to see any benchmarks / comparisons to understand what are the benefits of having Swift in the browser. Is it faster? Easier to maintain? Or is it based more on the sympathy to the programming language in general?

    But great job anyway!

  • brailsafe 8 hours

    Looks a bit like jQuery mixed with jsx and ember or angular

  • MichaelTestGrid 1 hours

    [flagged]

  • maxdo 9 hours

    Any reason/motivation why ?

    simonleeb 12 minutes

    ElementaryUI author here.

    The honest original motivation was mostly "Swift for websites, can I do it?". But underneath, I really want to use one capable and modern language (+ ecosystem and tooling) for all my dev needs. That includes having a native, "in-ecosystem" solution for creating web apps of any kind. Somebody's gotta build it...

    I recently wrote a bit about that on the swift.org blog: https://www.swift.org/blog/whats-new-in-swift-august-2026/

  • jan_m_savage 8 hours

    sooner or later this was gonna happen. Swift is like Haskell, but nicer and more programmer-friendly.

    isodev 2 hours

    I wouldn’t fly so close to Apple if I have the choice. Apple could pivot at any moment - “New versions of Swift start at $99,99” /s

    earthnail 14 minutes

    New versions of Swift are truly cross-platform. We support iOS, iPadOS, MacOS, HomeOS, VisionOS, WatchOS as well as BodyOS, BrainOS and iThinkOS.

    To help developers focus on the future, Swift 9 drops support for deprecated platforms such as Linux, Windows and the web.

    /s

    I'm actually a Swift developer; it's a great language, but I'm also married to the Apple ecosystem and wouldn't choose it outside of it.

    simonleeb 3 minutes

    ElementaryUI author here (so biased):

    I agree that is a real risk, but imho past behavior suggests that "Apple" Apple and open-source Apple both can exist and it's likely going to be just fine.

    On the plus side: Apple is paying many many real people to progress the language and tooling mostly in the open with solid community work.

  • adrusi 11 hours

    Reminiscent of the now 18-year-old Cappuccino project https://www.cappuccino.dev/

    indstinctdialog 7 hours

    Objective-J is something I entirely forgot existed.

    pipeline_peak 10 hours

    I’d say this is closer to Blazor

    sapphire4 8 hours

    The web version of Keynote with it was amazing.

    sampton 10 hours

    I paid $20 for their interface builder and never got it.

    frizlab 10 hours

    Project that is still alive, amazingly.

    thejazzman 4 hours

    > Latest Version: 1.0.0 (September 4 2018)

    jdminhbg 4 hours

    The last release and blog post are from 2018, is it actually alive?

    joelkesler 4 hours

    Yep! If you look at the GitHub repo, there is commits added in the last 5 days:

    https://github.com/cappuccino/cappuccino/commits/main/

  • pipeline_peak 10 hours

    We already have Typescript, I don’t see the purpose.

    astafrig 7 hours

    This sentiment is sorely missing from the endless Rust re-writes.

    vips7L 2 hours

    Typescript isn’t that good of a language.

    frizlab 10 hours

    ‘cause Swift is great, I guess! And more seriously, probably for a shared logic with an iOS & android app.

    alsetmusic 9 hours

    Just wait until they rewrite Swift with Rust.

    monster_truck 8 hours

    I'd rather use Slopjective-C 3.0 tbh