• Hacker News
  • new|
  • comments|
  • show|
  • ask|
  • jobs|
  • surfingdino 2 hours

    Must have been a contractor. The permies would wait for the procurement process to pick someone to move those stones for them. /s

  • JKFSOM 21 minutes

    Meanwhile, in Egypt...

  • hashim 4 hours

    The word for this structure is apparently a menhir: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menhir. The article calls it the tallest in the UK but its Wikipedia page calls it the second-tallest. This is the actual tallest, interestingly also in Yorkshire: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudston_Monolith.

  • chrisweekly 50 minutes

    Ken Follett (of "Pillars of the Earth" fame) wrote a terrific semi-historical* novel called "Circle of Days" that portrays a vivid picture of the people and circumstances that could've led to the creation of Stonehenge.

    *"semi" qualifier bc there's so little known for sure -- but it's at least plausible, and his extensive research doesn't contradict things that can be verified.

  • spikels 3 hours

    Strange they don't mention how many stones. Image shows two. There are three today and four, maybe five, originally.

  • airin_stories 1 hours

    [dead]

  • cjs_ac 5 hours

    Also, Stonehenge was built (partially) from parts of other stone circles, from as far away as Wales: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-56029203

    airin_stories 1 hours

    [dead]

    graemep 3 hours

    and at least one stone came from Scotland: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c207lqdn755o

  • dgan 3 hours

    Need 7 more paragraphes telling us that the stones, weren't in fact, chosen from the nearest location, but were chosen from a distant location.

    Without ever telling *how" they were moved of course, that would give out too much

    dogscatstrees 1 hours

    Quite easy. They were moved like this:

    https://youtu.be/YpNuh-J5IgE

  • ButlerianJihad 5 hours

    This must be the origin of the saying, “People who start stone rows shouldn’t build glass houses”.

    vogelke 4 hours

    Lovely.

  • ChrisRR 5 hours

    Imperial is confusing at the best of times, but couldn't they have said 24.5 tons instead of 55,000 lbs?

    5 hours

    Xmd5a 3 hours

    Sir ...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_ton

    > he long ton,[1] also known as the imperial ton, displacement ton,[1][2] or British ton,[3] is a measurement unit equal to 2,240 pounds

    guenthert 5 hours

    They could have said 3300 stones stones ...

    euroderf 4 hours

    That rocks.

    masfuerte 5 hours

    That's the way they like it. American road signs have mad shit like "No trucks over 15,000 lbs".

    hamdingers 1 hours

    This is an is-ought inference. Americans have not been given an option and use the units they're provided with, which is a frustrating mix of everything depending on context.

    Nobody seems to like it this way.

    thechao 4 hours

    That's because we measure weight in tonnage.

    close04 4 hours

    In the EU and UK the weight of the vehicle is on the signs too [0], or the weight per axle [1].

    [0] https://hgvlgvtraining.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/weig...

    [1] https://freesvg.org/img/B13a.png

    dboreham 2 hours

    The American thousands of pounds thing is even more weird than that: I buy gravel from the gravel pit. They weigh my truck and dump trailer in lbs and then charge me per ton. Everyone talks about tons: e.g. I'd call a dump truck operator and ask him to deliver 18 tons of rock, not 36,000lbs. But the weighbridge and road signs and regulations about vehicle and axle weight are always in lbs. If you only read things and never talked to other people you'd never know tons existed.

    cucumber3732842 1 hours

    A lot of the older "no vehicles over X" signage is denominated in tons.

    walthamstow 4 hours

    Surely they don't actually like drill bits measured in fractions of an inch, do they?

    edoceo 3 hours

    Yes, in USA the bits are in fractions and stuff you purchase will have instructions like, drill 3/8 hole for a wall anchor, or 2+1/4 hole for a door-bolt set.

  • dmichulke 5 hours

    25-tonne stones for 18km in case you wondered

    robertlagrant 5 hours

    For anyone confused, British people would generally use tonnes (or tons, but maybe not know the difference exactly) and miles.

    5 hours

    SECProto 4 hours

    Or 3928 stone stones

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stone_(unit)

    walthamstow 3 hours

    Stones are the Fahrenheit of weight. Useful for the human body but fuck all else.

    nickt 4 hours

    Or about 3 double-decker buses for the length of 171 footy pitches.

    blater 3 hours

    to clarify for those of a nautical bent - that's about half a blue whale for about 4/5ths of a dozen nautical miles

    gnufx 4 hours

    That's not dimensionally correct! Double-decker bus is a unit of length, and footy pitch is too prosaic to be an approved unit: https://www.theregister.com/bootnotes/2026/05/31/the-reg-onl...

    frereubu 3 hours

    It's a shame it's not about area then at least we could agree on Wales as a unit.

    tantalor 3 hours

    It's not too prosaic, it's just too imprecise. There is no standard size, and some regulations even allow a range of sizes.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_pitch

    gnufx 2 hours

    I don't think that's relevant for Register units. Clearly there's a standard brontosaurus somewhere, for instance, otherwise how could we have the conversion table? However, sorry, I was wrong about the football pitch, at least as a unit of area, equal to 194.89nWa per the original article: https://www.theregister.com/offbeat/2007/08/24/so-whats-the-...