• Hacker News
  • new|
  • comments|
  • show|
  • ask|
  • jobs|
  • esafak 3 hours

    Looks good. If it is not too early to ask, how fast are compile times and executables, and informative are the error messages?

  • xixixao 44 seconds

    Looks very tasteful! Good job!

  • nyankosensei 4 hours

    Thanks for sharing. Very interesting, especially since it’s based on Koka, which I’ve been experimenting with and still trying to wrap my head around. It also reminds me a lot of Shen (https://shenlanguage.org/). I’ll definitely try this out.

    How do you pronounce the name?

  • jdw64 4 hours

    It feels like C#, so it seems easy to learn. Looks fun.

  • mogoh 3 hours

    Does this aims to be the python of functional programming languages?

  • cladamski79 3 days

    hica is a functional, expression-based programming language, everything is an expression and immutable by default. Its goal is to make programming very approachable for beginners (and veterans alike). You learn by doing small programs, then dive deeper on a thing you really want to build.

    This is a guide on functional programming which covers immutability, higher-order functions, pipelines, and more, all with runnable examples.

    If that is to theoretical there is https://www.hica.dev/docs/hica-for-beginners/ that walks through functions, pattern matching, and lists by building real programs.

    Happy to answer questions about the design decisions, the implementation or how to get started.

    smw 45 minutes

    Any concurrency / parallelism?

    4 hours

    alfanick 3 hours

    Any examples of bigger and practical projects written in hica?

  • blanched 4 hours

    Quick fyi that your website is “zoomed in” on mobile safari and a little difficult to use

    (Apologies if it’s just my device)

    I’ll take a closer look on my desktop later today, I love seeing new programming languages. Sounds interesting!

    tgv 2 hours

    Same here. Needs one of those "standard" html headers, I think.

    lioeters 1 hours

    Hm, I checked the site and it does have one of these:

      <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
    
    Which is the standard. I wonder if something else is interfering with it.