[flagged]
HN Hug of Death: https://web.archive.org/web/20260522134016/https://robida.ne...
> I like how weird it is. I might use it for my site, who knows?
If there's a place to use a weird and fun language it is certainly one's own personal blog. Sounds like a great opportunity, I think you should do it.
> Something like this:
> : h1 ( s -- ) "<h1>" emit . "</h1>" emit ;
> "Hello, World!" h1
So, what’s the difference between . and emit? It seems both take a string and output it to the HTML of the page. If so I don’t see why that couldn’t be
: h1 ( s -- ) "<h1>" . . "</h1>" . ;
"2026-05-21T14:00:00Z" "May 21, 2026" dt-published
There's no docs or implementation, but I'd say that `.` in Forth is a generic way to print something, and `emit` may do more work, like HTML escaping.
LLM-based coding is enabling so much! The crazy weekend project now can have compilation to native code and web assembly, allow server-side or client-side rendering, manage multiple types of persistence, include adaptive compression, and do all of this without breaking a sweat.
It's scary but I love it.
For all its worth this could just be an AI generated blog post. There is no code, no repository, no link to any use.
And yet people keep using React, relying on a fractal pattern of kludges.
React (and the unidirectional FRP approach in general) is the only known sane way to describe complex GUIs. It's the same approach that powers spreadsheet calculations.
Most websites are not complex GUIs though, and do not need React.
[dead]
This post isn't offering anything better.